<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins</id>
  <title type="text">talk.origins Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Evolution versus creationism (sometimes hot!). (Moderated)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/talk.origins/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="talk.origins feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-22T05:17:22Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.fi" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Wilkins</name>
  <email>j...@wilkins.id.au</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T04:40:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/d23845c61534ff13/20c6665e5ee463f6?show_docid=20c6665e5ee463f6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/d23845c61534ff13/20c6665e5ee463f6?show_docid=20c6665e5ee463f6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: OT: Animal Intelligence: Dogs learn how to ride subways on their</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;9pndq5d83p3lnq6b607s5gi6avit9 gs...@4ax.com&amp;gt;, Desertphile &lt;br&gt; About fifteen years back I visited Athabasca in Alberta around the time &lt;br&gt; of the summer solstice (2 hours&#39; sleep, ack!). My hosts took two large &lt;br&gt; malamutes with them everywhere they walked. I asked why. They said that &lt;br&gt; sometimes bears attack humans (I saw a brown bear in their garden, from
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Wilkins</name>
  <email>j...@wilkins.id.au</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T04:34:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/448c015d1411f4a2/f26acacdcb881ec6?show_docid=f26acacdcb881ec6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/448c015d1411f4a2/f26acacdcb881ec6?show_docid=f26acacdcb881ec6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Howlerfest attendance: Who would...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;5b4d239c-1563-4094-bde8-40d97 d47a...@w39g2000prd.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Okay, now I&#39;m attending too.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>RAM</name>
  <email>ramather...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T05:17:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/0143985fff451c38/08d58ed2481e9130?show_docid=08d58ed2481e9130</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/0143985fff451c38/08d58ed2481e9130?show_docid=08d58ed2481e9130"/>
  <title type="text">Re: John Wilkins</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Oh, I&#39;m sure you have been enculturated enough in the Western &lt;br&gt; religious tradition to have heard about Joseph&#39;s coat of many colors. &lt;br&gt; If not your it means your stupid version of creationism is just &lt;br&gt; another color of the same self-deceptive coat of ignorance that &lt;br&gt; clothes you. &lt;br&gt; Further I&#39;m sure you understand well enough to wish you had a sensible
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Hare-Scott</name>
  <email>sec...@nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T04:35:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/467faf1217a9ba4d?show_docid=467faf1217a9ba4d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/467faf1217a9ba4d?show_docid=467faf1217a9ba4d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: How Creation is Created:</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Perhaps they are standing for the McGillicuddy Serious Party. &lt;br&gt; David
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>chris thompson</name>
  <email>chris.linthomp...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T04:24:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/06ee4e8b8efcd9ba?show_docid=06ee4e8b8efcd9ba</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/06ee4e8b8efcd9ba?show_docid=06ee4e8b8efcd9ba"/>
  <title type="text">Re: How Creation is Created:</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Inconclusive. Many- ok, some- people I know would fail it too. &lt;br&gt; Chris
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Camp</name>
  <email>robertlc...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T03:50:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/0143985fff451c38/ce8f4519a9926c1a?show_docid=ce8f4519a9926c1a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/0143985fff451c38/ce8f4519a9926c1a?show_docid=ce8f4519a9926c1a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: John Wilkins</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Just as a point of order here I would like to note that you have &lt;br&gt; created an entirely false equivalence. I won&#39;t speculate on its &lt;br&gt; purpose, but its effect is to muddy the argument and deflect criticism. &lt;br&gt; The charges levied against ISKCON are not in doubt or under debate - &lt;br&gt; you have confirmed this. Despite the fact that restitution was made
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Hare-Scott</name>
  <email>sec...@nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T03:38:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/04fcae5af328dfb5?show_docid=04fcae5af328dfb5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/04fcae5af328dfb5?show_docid=04fcae5af328dfb5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: How Creation is Created:</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Very prolific for one only 8 years old. &lt;br&gt; David
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>el cid</name>
  <email>elcidbi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T03:22:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/625d7fdcfbe94852?show_docid=625d7fdcfbe94852</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/625d7fdcfbe94852?show_docid=625d7fdcfbe94852"/>
  <title type="text">Re: I had an interesting argument this week...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Before people start apologizing, I&#39;d want to know why a conversation &lt;br&gt; that, in the thread you referenced and that the OP acknowledged, was &lt;br&gt; from Nov. 2009 but the subject here references &#39;this week&#39;. Not &lt;br&gt; stellar in the honesty department.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Siemon</name>
  <email>mlsie...@sonic.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T03:01:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/f6e5aa4f5a7548ff?show_docid=f6e5aa4f5a7548ff</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/f6e5aa4f5a7548ff?show_docid=f6e5aa4f5a7548ff"/>
  <title type="text">Re: I had an interesting argument this week...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;ho6lhe02...@news5.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; ... &lt;br&gt; Good point. I am uncertain at this stage. I have reason to believe that &lt;br&gt; the original poster was not disingenuous, and I have apologized on that. &lt;br&gt; Hypocrisy is indeed endemic in _our kind_ of social animal. E.g., &lt;br&gt; Congress.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>r norman</name>
  <email>r_s_nor...@comcast.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T02:51:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/268b0f59c5634cd3?show_docid=268b0f59c5634cd3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/268b0f59c5634cd3?show_docid=268b0f59c5634cd3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: I had an interesting argument this week...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:25:07 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans &lt;br&gt; I have been reading &amp;quot;From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate &lt;br&gt; Theory of Time&amp;quot; by Sean Carrol, a highly regarded theoretical &lt;br&gt; physicist. This book will convince you that, according to modern &lt;br&gt; physical theories of cosmology, information has EVERYTHING to do with
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>el cid</name>
  <email>elcidbi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T02:50:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/448c015d1411f4a2/e0fd00769f6d4e7b?show_docid=e0fd00769f6d4e7b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/448c015d1411f4a2/e0fd00769f6d4e7b?show_docid=e0fd00769f6d4e7b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Howlerfest attendance: Who would...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  And I for one, but I probably speak for many other here, deeply &lt;br&gt; respect your decision to keep things on-topic.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>William Morse</name>
  <email>wdnospammo...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T02:44:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/ff64d987d5c15a05?show_docid=ff64d987d5c15a05</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/05a6af613736c869/ff64d987d5c15a05?show_docid=ff64d987d5c15a05"/>
  <title type="text">Re: I had an interesting argument this week...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The post may or may not be bogus. Regardless, you have two choices. You &lt;br&gt; can respond with useful information, or you can dismiss the post. If you &lt;br&gt; respond with useful information, you may be informing a newbie or you &lt;br&gt; may be wasting your time. If you respond with an insult, you may be &lt;br&gt; alienating a newbie or you may be wasting your time. It seems to me that
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>raven1</name>
  <email>quoththera...@nevermore.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T02:41:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/c817df883a916961/42aea7dc71c5312d?show_docid=42aea7dc71c5312d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/c817df883a916961/42aea7dc71c5312d?show_docid=42aea7dc71c5312d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Chez Watt nomination (was: By their fruits, Mar 2010)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  She turned me into a newt!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>raven1</name>
  <email>quoththera...@nevermore.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T02:42:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/ce1e4b237b4d46e3?show_docid=ce1e4b237b4d46e3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/3c7e17bbf7be21f1/ce1e4b237b4d46e3?show_docid=ce1e4b237b4d46e3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: How Creation is Created:</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:18:54 -0700, Desertphile &lt;br&gt; If so, it failed the Turing test.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike Painter</name>
  <email>md.pain...@sbcglobal.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T02:34:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/154b2d92a19bea47/54e0b924786308d5?show_docid=54e0b924786308d5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.fi/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/154b2d92a19bea47/54e0b924786308d5?show_docid=54e0b924786308d5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: An idea for change...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Theory is never proven and the fact that atoms exist, just as teh fact that &lt;br&gt; evolution and gravity exist does not prove the theory. &lt;br&gt; If you doubt this get a chemistry book from today and 50 years ago and &lt;br&gt; compare the &amp;quot;atoms&amp;quot;
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
